Arguing
that education is the key to curing poverty is like saying swimming
will prevent drowning. Of course, but could the best instructor in the
world teach a child to swim if the student showed up for lessons wearing
20-pound weights on each arm?
That weight –
the onerous burden of poverty – is what holds back many Louisiana
children. It’s what makes the efforts of even the best teachers so
challenging. When a child arrives at school unprepared or unable to
learn because of circumstances beyond the school’s or its teachers’
control, why would we blame the school and its teachers?
Surely,
those seeking public office, especially many now running for governor
and the Legislature, understand this. They know that (on average) a sick
child, an emotionally or physically battered child or a hungry child
cannot learn, in the same way, at the same pace, as a child without
those enormous challenges. So, why do so many of our leaders respond to
questions about poverty by tossing off mindless, simplistic answers
like, “The solution to poverty is a good education”?
I
suspect they know it’s evasive and naive, but what else can the average
politician tell you? The truth? Imagine a candidate with the courage to
say the following:
“Look, I could give you
the usual boilerplate answer about poverty. I could blame it on
substandard schools and lazy teachers, and you’d nod your heads in
agreement. That’s what you want to hear. You want to believe that if our
teachers would just work harder, all our problems would disappear.
“Blaming
poverty on our teachers and the schools is a cop out. It absolves us of
our collective responsibility for the scandal of poverty. We’re
scapegoating teachers, which is very much like blaming doctors for an
outbreak of the common cold. They are only dealing with symptoms of a
problem that existed before the patient arrived.
Zandar on
why black voters punish Democratic candidates for defending public education.
No comments:
Post a Comment