Thursday, August 27, 2009

Make the Eulogy a Declaration of War

The wingnuts are hysterically screaming orders to Democrats not to "politicize" Senator Kennedy's death. Why? Because they are justifiably terrified of the power inherent in a eulogy to the nation's Greatest Modern Liberal.

And who but the nation's greatest living orator to give a rafter-shaking, foundation-cracking, send-'em-into-the-streets Liberal Call To Arms?

John Nichols of The Nation makes the case for the only kind of eulogy that would truly honor Senator Edward M. Kennedy.

The only question is whether Obama will honor the moment and use it, as Kennedy once did, to speak not merely of a life lost but of a cause unbowed.

To do right by Kennedy, Obama must make his words on Saturday more than a eulogy.

He must deliver a renewing address, both for the causes Kennedy championed -- of which the first and foremost is universal health care -- and for the presidency in which the late senator invested as much hope as the most idealistic Obama volunteer.

Obama must speak in the Kennedy tradition when he rises to speak Saturday morning at Boston's Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help.

SNIP

My brother need not be idealized, or enlarged in death beyond what he was in life; to be remembered simply as a good and decent man, who saw wrong and tried to right it, saw suffering and tried to heal it, saw war and tried to stop it.

Those of us who loved him and who take him to his rest today, pray that what he was to us and what he wished for others will some day come to pass for all the world.

As he said many times, in many parts of this nation, to those he touched and who sought to touch him: 'Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not.'

With those words, Ted Kennedy grabbed the flag of American liberalism and raised it aloft -- reshaping the anguished cry at his brother's assassination into an inspired call to action.

Obama faces a different task than the one Kennedy performed on June 8, 1968, at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York. He is eulogizing a friend, not a brother. He is speaking of a man who died in relative old age, not the youthful victim of an assassination.

And, yet, the stakes are just as high.

Few would seriously debate that Barack Obama has been too cautious, too unfocused in the first months of the presidency that Ted Kennedy imagined would be characterized by: "New hope for justice and fair prosperity for the many, and not just for the few. New hope -- and this is the cause of my life -- new hope that we will break the old gridlock and guarantee that every American -- north, south, east, west, young, old -- will have decent, quality healthcare as a fundamental right and not a privilege."

Obama has an opportunity to honor Kennedy by turning this moment of loss into a moment of renewal.

This is not just what Kennedy would have requested.

It is what the liberal lion would have demanded.

Read the whole thing.

2 comments:

Old Scout said...

Oh give me a break!
Kennedy is just another celebraty who's dieing is being exploited by the media to draw our attention away from real problems.

Oh give me a break!
Kennedy a liberal? Not fucking lately. He's the one who invented negotiating back room bipartisan agreements by loyal minions that Republican'ts would ignore during the vote, while he stood to the side and lamented the demise of fair play.

Oh give me a break!
Kennedy money came the same way as all the other Republican'ts' money ... law breaking, cheating and thieving. Jack bought elections. Bobby persecuted organized labor. Teddy was at Chappaquiddick. Skels all.
.

SJ said...

@Old Scout,
I suppose one could let those generalizations of yours stand if this was a world of averages, but it isn't. Here are some specific accomplishments you are overlooking or trying to dismiss with references to Joseph Kennedy's bootlegging & election rigging and RFK's battle with Jimmy Hoffa:

When President Kennedy, introduced the Civil Rights Bill in June of 1963, (months after Ted Kennedy joined the Senate in November '62)
it met opposition in the Senate, and was filibustered for 57 days. Ted Kennedy was recovering from a plane crash that nearly killed him, but he made it to the Senate to fight for end the filibuster. The bill's eventual passing months later was due in large part to his "negotiating back room partisan agreements by loyal minions" in your words -but he did it with others in the Senate as well, including Republicans. This may not matter to you, but it's world changing for me and other people who have the great benefit of growing up in a post 60s America with legal racial segregation as history -and not a daily reality.
Senator Ted Kennedy advocated Gay rights, opposing the "Defense of Marriage Act" and the so-called "Constitutional ban on same-sex marriage."
He also fought for federal funding for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but I live in New York City, where I lost teachers and good friends to the AIDS epidemic while I was still in college and as recently as the
1990s.
Ted Kennedy successfully fought for the voting age to start at 18, which I think makes a lot of sense: If you're old enough to serve and die in war, you're old enough to vote for the Commander-in-Chief for whom you will serve -and hopefully not die.
Poor people get help heating their homes during the winter thanks to legislation Ted Kennedy co-authored.
Because of Ted Kennedy, the federal government funds Cancer research.
Today, the Defense Department provides child care services for the children of our soldiers because of legislation made possible by Ted Kennedy.

There's much more that he did on behalf of many Americans across all walks of life, and frankly for Americans yet to be born.

Frankly, I wish he'd had ten more years in him. After all, we wouldn't be talking about healthcare today if he hadn't picked up where Truman left off, in 1962 stating his desire for medical coverage for everyone.

Ted Kennedy may have killed, or been indirectly responsible for the death of Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick: an undeniably reprehensible criminal act. But it doesn't erase all he did on behalf of the people of the United States, -nor does his legislative career absolve him.

I'm thankful for his legacy regarding the latter.

-SJ