A Simple, Low-Cost Tax Fix to Help Working Families
It's easy to give up on helping the working poor because it seems that doing so requires massive, expensive intervention beyond our current capability.
But in fact there are many ways that small but critical changes in current law and regulations could help millions of families.
Like this one, from Kevin Drum:
Over at the Washington Independent, Martha White has a good piece about tax preparers who prey on low-income filers by hard selling refund anticipation loans, which typically boast effective interest rates of anywhere from 50% to 1000%. The whole thing is worth reading, but here's an interesting tidbit:The big appeal of these loans, the Woodstock Institute’s Rand points out, is the prospect of instant money. Already, taxpayers who e-file and elect to receive their refund via direct deposit generally get their returns within two weeks. If the IRS sped up its payments to taxpayers outside the mainstream banking system and allowed them to receive that money on a debit card similar to those used for other benefits, the appeal of RALs would be diminished. “These improvements the IRS could make would eliminate a need for refund anticipation loans,” Rand said.
Here's a guess: an awful lot of low-income taxpayer have simple returns that could be pre-filled out by the IRS. This isn't done today largely because of opposition from tax preparers, who don't want to lose any business. But guess what else they might lose: their RAL business. If you received a pre-prepared statement in the mail and could accept it with a simple phone call or e-filing, there's no reason the feds couldn't get refunds out within days. With no tax preparer pushing the loans, and refunds available quickly in any case, the entire shifty industry would be wiped out. And it would be wiped out by making government more efficient. Who could object to that?
Only the repugs and Blue Dogs who would rather slit their own throats than lift a finger to help poor people, of course.
3 comments:
No one in Washington seems willing to lift the most oppressive tax burden (by far) on the working poor: the 15.3% payroll tax on every dollar they earn. (For someone earning $20K, that's more than $3,000!)
Unless they're single, the working poor don't pay a dime in federal income taxes, but they are mauled by the payroll tax.
If we taxed the wealthy at the rate they were taxed before Ronald Reagan ruined this country and reduced everyone else's taxes, we'd all be a hell of a lot better off and there would be far, far fewer poor and working poor. Those at the top of the income scale have been getting away with economic murder for nearly 30 years now!
Reagan reduced income taxes on the working poor, so it's not all bad.
Are you talking about average or marginal tax rates for the wealthy? Assuming the latter, you're not a fan of JFK either, then, right?
Post a Comment