Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Next Health Care Reform Non-Issue

First, a quick refresher:

The only interest the repugs have in health care reform is how it can be exploited to destroy President Obama and the Democratic Party and return themselves to dictatorial power. Even the high priorities of enriching their campaign contributors, protecting the wealthy and fucking over the poor come second to political victory.

To that end, they will lie about everything and anything. Now, health care reform gives them the opportunity to combine two of their favorite pasttimes: lying, and trying to control other people's sex lives.

The Rude Pundit explains:

There's plain facts in this nation. One of those is that abortion remains legal, despite the efforts of some states to regulate it to near-elimination, despite the efforts of individuals to intimidate or kill those involved in the procedure, despite the mewls of the religious that an invisible sky wizard is offended by it. It is still legal.

Yet, in this health care debate, it's not enough for anti-choice nutzoids that the federal government is banned from directly funding abortions. It's not enough that if any public option happens, abortions cannot be paid for by it. No, now anti-choicers want any insurance plan that is part of an "exchange" from which people can choose cannot have abortion coverage because people buying into those plans may be getting subsidies from the government to do so. Follow the bouncing ball to madness here: pro-choicers have already done financial contortions to please the anti-choicers, making it so any subsidies would not actually be used for abortions. But, see, that ain't good enough because, in the even more contorted logic of the conservative crazeratti, any money that's paid to insurers from the government frees up funds to pay for abortion.

Again, this is over a legal medical procedure that simply displeases a segment of the population. It's merely a back door way to outlaw abortions through a thousand cuts, it's another conservative assault on women, it's another hypocrisy in that the only time a business is regulated is to conform to some outdated notions of morality because it gets the yahoos out to vote. It is, ultimately, an argument over a pittance, and it's also another bullshit way to possibly derail reform.

How about this: ask how many people would rather that Iraq/Afghanistan budget go for health insurance for Americans. Then we're talking real money.

Today the fight in the Senate is over the public option. The abortion debate is coming. The landscape is strewn with mines set by the right. The only question is if Democrats are going to try to tiptoe around them or just bulldoze the shit out of them.

Read the whole thing.

Then get cracking:

Here's a quick way to get to the contact information for your elected officials. (Scroll down to box on the right labelled "My Elected Officials" and enter your zip code.)

Alternatively, Max at Firedoglake explains how to put recalcitrant congress critters up against the wall - the Facebook wall.

You can reach your members of congress by calling (202) 224-3121.

2 comments:

mud_rake said...

The only thing that Repugs....

May I also add those scoundrel Dems who killed the publicf option- the same ones who are more interested in being reelected than in serving the citizens of this nation. The ones whose war chest is brimming with tainted dollars from the insurance companies and Pharma.

Eric Schansberg said...

I appreciate mud-rake's comment-- and it brings up a broader issue/question: which is more frustrating?

a.) when supposed supporters do big stuff you find offensive and should know better;

OR

b.) when opponents do bigger stuff you find offensive

GOP'ers have a version of that with "fiscal conservatism"-- Obama is a nut, but Bush was bad and he should have known better.

Now, Dems have one. You knew the GOP wouldn't support this. But you should be able to count on the Dems to take care of health care-- but they haven't (and probably won't).

Of course, it's important to note that few in the GOP are fiscal conservatives and few Dems are actually interested in social justice and the working poor. (For example, most Dems want to increase payroll taxes instead of ending a regressive, horribly burdensome tax on the working poor.) But both groups talk a mean game!