Either
the soul survives death or it does not, and there is no scientific
evidence that it does or ever will. Does science and skepticism
extirpate all meaning in life? I think not; quite the opposite, in fact.
If this is all there is, then how meaningful become our lives, our
families, our friends, our communities—and how we treat others—when
every day, every moment, every relationship, and every person counts;
not as props in a temporary staging before an eternal tomorrow
where ultimate purpose will be revealed to us, but as valued essences
in the here-and-now where provisional purpose is created by us.
Awareness of this reality elevates us all to a higher plane of humanity
and humility, as we course through life together in this limited time
and space—a momentary proscenium in the drama of the cosmos.
#1. God
According to Oxford University Press’s World Christian Encyclopedia,
84% of the world’s population belongs to some form of organized
religion, and a 2007 Pew Forum survey found that 92% of Americans
believe in God “or a universal spirit”.
God or a universal spirit 92%
Heaven 74%
Hell 59%
Miracles 79%
I
realize that calling belief in God a “weird thing” will be offensive to
some, but to be intellectually honest and consistent it should be
correctly classified as a supernatural belief because by most
traditional believers’ accounts God is conceived as all
powerful (omnipotent), all knowing (omniscient), and all good
(omnibenevolent); who created out of nothing the universe and everything
in it; who is uncreated and eternal, a noncorporeal spirit who created,
loves, and can grant eternal life to humans.
I
do not believe in any such god. Further, I believe that there is
substantive evidence to show that God and religion are human and social
constructions based on research from psychology, anthropology, history,
comparative mythology, and sociology. I present this evidence in my book
The Believing Brain.
As well, the burden of proof is on believers to prove God’s
existence—not on nonbelievers to disprove it—and to date theists have
failed to prove God’s existence, at least by the high evidentiary
standards of science and reason.
I also note a
problem we face with the God question: certainty is not possible when
we bump up against such ultimate questions as “What was there before
time began?” or “If the Big Bang marked the beginning of all time,
space, and matter, what triggered this first act of creation?” The fact
that science has yet to answer these questions with certainty doesn’t
faze scientists because theologians hit the same epistemological wall.
You just have to push them one more step. For example, in my debates and
dialogues with theologians the exchange usually goes something like
this for the question of what triggered the Big Bang:
God did it.
Who created God?
God is He who needs not be created.
Why can’t the universe be “that which needs not be created?”
The
universe is a thing or an event, whereas God is an agent or being, and
things and events have to be created by something, but an agent or being
does not.
Isn’t God a thing if He is part of the universe?
God is not a thing. God is an agent or being.
Don’t
agents and beings have to be created as well? We’re an agent, a being—a
human being. We agree that human beings need an explanation for our
origin. So why does this causal reasoning not apply to God as agent and
being?
God is outside of time, space, and matter, and thus needs no explanation.
If
that is the case, then it is not possible for any of us to know if
there is a God or not because, by definition, as finite beings operating
exclusively within the natural world we can only know other natural
beings and objects. It is not possible for a natural finite being to
know a supernatural infinite being.
Thus it is that skepticism in this realm, as in so many others, is altogether appropriate. As the bumper sticker says:
Militant Agnostic: I Don’t Know and You Don’t Either.
© 2015 Michael Shermer, All rights reserved