Friday, October 30, 2009

Health Care Reform Booby Trap Number 3

Several bloggers have discussed this, but none as concisely as the Rude Pundit. (Rated PG)

The amendment passed the Energy and Commerce Committee and was included in the final bill House Speaker Nancy Pelosi introduced yesterday. And it does, indeed, explicitly ban federal funds from being used for abortions, except as the Hyde Amendment allows.

So, of course, the pro-lifers all over the political map have declared that the bill is "mandating abortion services."

See, the way that these anti-choice conservatives see it, even if no federal tax dollars are ever used for abortion, the simple fact that any of the plans in the exchange cover abortion means that federal funds would be used for, say, colds and cancer and paper clips, thus evilly freeing up other money to be used for abortions. Or, as an amendment pro-life Democrats, led by Michigan's Bart Stupak, are demanding be voted on in the House says, no federal funds may be used "to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion" except in cases of the trio mentioned above. And that goes even if one plan out of, say, a dozen in the exchange covers abortion.

You got that? Even though tax money can't be used for abortions, the right is gonna say it's being used indirectly for abortions, thus it's being used for abortions. It's like saying that if you and your buddy go to a strip club and he decides to get a lap dance, his girlfriend says it's your fault he came home with sticky pants.

In the next week, this is where the battle is gonna be. Sure, a lot is gonna be made about the price tag, but that'll fade, as will the stupidity over the actual, physical size of the bill. But, you know, we're an idiotic nation that has a juvenile discomfort with women's bodies and the rights that we can't seem to understand are settled law.

Read the whole thing.

The bill also fails to mandate coverage for contraceptives and other reproductive services for women, although you can bet your ass it requires coverage for Viagra and its imitators. The bill continues to guarantee unconscionable windfall profits for Big Pharma on breast cancer drugs. And it falls short of completely eliminating the premium surcharge paid by half the population.

Starting to see a pattern here? Shame on you, Nancy Pelosi.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

If the final bill is not a whole lot better than it is now, I say vote NO.


kentondem1