Sunday, March 7, 2010

And in the Non-Hating Corner, We Have Louisville Episcopalians

On the same weekend Kentucky's Southern Baptists launch their Hate, Fear and Money tour, we learn that last year, Louisville Episcopalians brought out the big guns of of love, acceptance and progress.

A Louisville congregation has quietly become the first in the Episcopal Diocese of Kentucky to begin blessing same-sex relationships.

St. Matthew’s Episcopal Church conducted its first such blessing late last year, for two male members of the congregation, after voting last April to approve such ceremonies.

The move, while not reflecting diocesan policy, is a milestone in one of the state’s denominations that generally has been the most accepting of gay members and ministers. But it also has complicated efforts to maintain unity, given that some churches and members oppose homosexuality.

The Rev. Lucinda Laird of St. Matthew’s stressed that the ceremony was not presented as a civil or sacramental wedding — since neither Kentucky nor the Episcopal Church recognizes same-sex marriages.

Nor, she said, was it presented as any other type of official rite of the national church. The church adapted a same-sex liturgy used by an Anglican diocese in western Canada.

St. Matthew’s approved a policy allowing blessings of same-sex relationships in April 2009 after two years of study. The church also took affirmation from the denomination’s main legislative body — the General Convention — which in July 2009 called for “a generous pastoral response” toward same-sex couples.

“We believe that committed Christians can differ in their interpretation of Scripture” on homosexuality, Laird said. “We see in Scripture a constant demand for justice and the radical love and inclusivity of Jesus.”

You're still a few miles short of reality world there Rev, but as long as it makes the haters foam at the mouth in frustration, I'm cheering.

2 comments:

Old Scout said...

Please quote Cinda correctly:
“We believe that committed Christians can differ in their interpretation of Scripture” on homosexuality, Laird said.

She acknowledged differences of opinion --- you insinuated that she meant only on homosexuality.

The theological differences in interpretation include such mundane issues as titheing; was telephone use included in biblical admonitions and such knotty issues as substantiation - Is it con sub... or trans-sub... ?

Episcopalians were the first to support contraception; ordain & educate women to prepare them for the Ordinate (Semple-MacPherson wasn't ordained - she was self annointed); first to consecrate women as Bishops; first to put a woman 'in-charge' of the organization, and the first to elevate homosexuals - celebate or committed - to Bishop.

Damnation by faint praise is contra-indicated

mud_rake said...

I wonder if these more loving Christians can outlast those oh-so righteous, fundamentalist [c]hristians who engage in Hate-Theocracy?

Time will tell, I suppose.