Kentucky's law didn't get anywhere near the publicity, but trust me, it's just as bad.
Like Kentucky's, Mississippi's law only pretends to protect anti-gay bigots. It really
starts with a pass to brutalize, assault and torture children and
doesn't end until it exempts Xian freakazoids from literally every civil
and criminal statute. The bibble, after all, justifies everything -
theft, rape, assault, burglary, murder, even genocide - as long as your
invisible sky wizard friend told you to do it.
From The Nation:
One
of the more disconcerting sections of the law is that which discusses
people who provide foster-care services. The government, we are told,
will no longer be allowed to take action against any foster parent that
“guides, instructs, or raises a child…in a manner consistent with a
sincerely held religious belief.” If you want to know what that could
mean, check out Focus on the Family’s “spare the rod” philosophy of
child rearing. On its website, the religious-right advocacy group offers
handy tips on “the Biblical Approach to Spanking.”
SNIP
The
AFA and its allies on the religious right want to carve out a sphere in
American public life where religion—their religion—trumps the law. It’s
a breathtakingly radical ambition. And it upends the principles on
which our constitutional democracy is based.
None
other than the late Antonin Scalia put his finger on the problem. To
make an individual’s obedience to the law “contingent upon the law’s
coincidence with his religious beliefs” amounts to “permitting him, by
virtue of his beliefs, ‘to become a law unto himself,’” he said. It
“contradicts both constitutional tradition and common sense.” Scalia
made these comments in his 1990 majority opinion in Employment Division
v. Smith. In that case, the majority ruled that the state of Oregon
could deny unemployment benefits to a pair of individuals who violated a
state ban on the use of peyote, even though their use of the drug was
part of a religious ritual. It was the overreaction to that verdict—on
both the left and the right—that produced the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993. Though intended only to ensure that laws
did not needlessly burden the religious liberty of individuals, the
RFRA sparked a wave of unintended consequences. It effectively planted
the demon seeds of the current crop of “religious liberty” bills.
SNIP
To speak frankly, the law was designed to advance the claims of conservative Christians, and it never would have become law otherwise. If you think that every religion will find as much liberty in the laws of Mississippi, then I have as Satanic temple to sell you.
And yes, children, these laws are indeed the steep downhill path directly to Dominionism and theocratic control of the nation by people who think that even married, heterosexual, missionary-position, penis-in-vagina sex is a crime if it is in any way pleasurable (as former Senator and presidential candidate Rick Santorum made crystal clear many times in public.)
Somebody ask Matt Bevin if he finds sex pleasurable. If he answers yes, BURN HIM.