If we do
this right, we won't have to resort to violence, even in self-defense.
The
French Resistance (
French:
La Résistance) was the collection of French
resistance movements that fought against the
Nazi German occupation of France and against the collaborationist
Vichy régime during the
Second World War. Résistance
cells were small groups of armed men and women (called the
Maquis in rural areas),
[2][3] who, in addition to their
guerrilla warfare activities, were also publishers of
underground newspapers, providers of first-hand intelligence information, and maintainers of escape networks that helped
Allied
soldiers and airmen trapped behind enemy lines. The men and women of the
Résistance came from all economic levels and political leanings of
French society, including
émigrés; academics, students,
aristocrats, conservative
Roman Catholics (including priests) and also citizens from the ranks of
liberals,
anarchists and
communists.
The French Resistance played a significant role in facilitating the Allies' rapid advance through France following the
invasion of Normandy on
6 June 1944, and the lesser-known
invasion of Provence on 15 August, by providing
military intelligence on the German defences known as the
Atlantic Wall and on
Wehrmacht deployments and
orders of battle. The Résistance also planned, coordinated, and executed acts of sabotage
on the electrical power grid, transport facilities, and
telecommunications networks.
[4][5]
It was also politically and morally important to France, both during the
German occupation and for decades afterward, because it provided the
country with an inspiring example of the patriotic fulfillment of a
national imperative, countering an existential threat to French
nationhood. The actions of the Résistance stood in marked contrast to the
collaboration of the French
regime based at
Vichy,
[6][7] the French people who joined the pro-Nazi
Milice française and the French men who joined the
Waffen SS.
The
rhetoric is familiar: the demands to take the country back. The railing
against an out-of-touch elite. The anger at a rigged economic system.
But now the insurgent cries that propelled Donald Trump
to the White House have been taken up by stunned opponents as they try
to galvanise anger and fear over his election into a strategy to resist
his policies and remake the left as a credible political alternative.
“People
came out on the streets because they were in shock,” said Gregory
McKelvey, an experienced activist who founded a protest group, Portland’s Resistance,
as thousands joined spontaneous demonstrations in the liberal west
coast city within hours of Trump’s victory. “Now we are seeing a rising
up of people to say it’s supposed to be our country. The government’s
supposed to fear us, not the other way around.
“The
majority of Americans feel like it’s time for a big change and Donald
Trump is pushing for one form of drastic change. We are pushing for
another.”
The tide of protests that swept US
cities was matched by a wave of individual acts of resistance. Some
rallied on the streets and online under the banner Not My President.
Facebook groups popped up to plan how to challenge Trump over climate
change and misogyny. Donations to civil liberties groups surged in
defence of Muslims, immigrants and freedom of speech.
An online petition
demanding delegates to the electoral college switch their support to
Hillary Clinton because she won the popular vote has received more than
4m signatures. Activists in California and Oregon began the legal
process for their states to declare independence from the US, albeit an
unlikely prospect.
But
as shock and protest gave way to more considered strategies, the focus
shifted from the twin issues of opposition to the more egregious of
Trump’s proposed policies and how to build a liberal political movement
more representative of working Americans, with or without the Democratic
party.
Social justice organisations
supporting immigrant rights, fighting for the environment or tackling
institutional racism have been abruptly forced to shift their attention
from long-term policy to defence of existing rights in the face of
Trump’s threat of mass deportations, climate change denial and attacks
on Black Lives Matter.
The environmental group 350.org
called Trump’s election “a disaster” and said: “The climate movement
will put everything on the line to protect the progress we’ve made.”
Latino
organisations are laying plans to shield young undocumented immigrants
who benefitted from an Obama presidential executive order protecting
them from deportation. Trump can abolish it with the stroke of a pen.
Some
cities have promised to remain places of “sanctuary” for undocumented
immigrants. In Portland, the public schools board passed a resolution
limiting immigration officials’ access to campuses. The city’s schools
superintendent warned of a rise in racism tied to Trump: “We have seen a
number of incidents of hate speech over the last several months, and it
has risen significantly since (the election).” Other parts of a state sharply divided between liberal cities and
strongly Republican rural areas, groups opposing discrimination say
there has been a sharp increase in attacks on minorities.
The Nation says Welcome to the Fight:
If we withdraw into our grief and abandon those most threatened by Trump’s win, history will never forgive us.
Though
the full extent of the damage is still unclear, there is no denying the
magnitude of the upheaval: a man who campaigned on a platform of
hostility to immigrants, contempt for women, and disregard for civil and
religious liberty has now been elected president of the United States.
The same Republican Party that successfully stymied progressive
legislation for the last eight years, and obstructed President Obama at
every turn, now controls both the Senate and the House of
Representatives. And the Supreme Court, for so long the bulwark of our
liberties, is likely to become a rubber stamp for economic privilege and
social reaction—possibly for a generation.
Citizens United,
it seems, may just have been the beginning, unleashing a torrent of
corporate money that buried Russ Feingold, Zephyr Teachout, Ted
Strickland, and the California ballot initiative to control rising drug
prices. With Donald Trump and Mike Pence in the White House, and a
conservative majority again on the Court, decisions that seemed like
settled law only a few days ago—gay marriage, legal abortion, the right
to join a union, indeed, the very right to citizenship itself for all
born inside this country—may now well come under attack. These are all
fights we cannot afford to lose.
And
so, despite the temptation to mourn, we have to organize. Because if we
can’t rely on the president, or the Congress, or the courts, we have no
choice but to rely on one another. Not just for comfort but for
strength—and survival.
SNIP
The
Democratic Party is in deep disarray. American women have learned that
even a buffoon with no experience in government or history of public
service is more likely to be elected president—so long as he has a
penis, a television program, and a billion dollars (more or less). And
so many of our hopes—for free public college, a livable minimum wage,
expanded Social Security, a path to universal health care, paid family
leave, an end to private prisons, the abolition of the death penalty—now
lie shattered, along with the prospect of an administration that,
whatever its limitations, had been shown to be open to pressure from the
left.
Which means we have to apply even
greater pressure from the left: to march in greater numbers, to shout
out louder against injustice, and to summon and be prepared to sustain
everyday massive nonviolent civil disobedience on a scale not seen in
this country for decades. Not because we refuse to acknowledge the
results of the election. But because, as we would have written no matter
who won last night,
elections are only the beginning of the contest for power. And because
in the coming contest there are some in immediate peril, who need our
help, our energy, and our solidarity.
History
will judge this country—our leaders, our media-entertainment complex,
ourselves, and our fellow citizens—harshly for electing Donald Trump.
But if we withdraw into our private grief and abandon those who, this morning,
feel most threatened by the result—Muslim Americans, Hispanic
Americans, LGBTQ Americans, women, inner-city youth—history will never
forgive us.
Instead,
we have to stand up, and fight back. And to realize that we are not
without resources, and advantages, and potential leaders, in that fight.
SNIP
But
when—as will far more often be the case—they offer pretend solutions,
we should expose them. And when they pose a threat to our rights, our
fellow citizens, or the health of our planet, we must oppose them by
every peaceful means at our disposal, from filibuster in the Senate and
endless amendments in the House to physical obstruction of the machinery
of repression, including massive mobilization and demonstrations on our
streets and in our cities.
Given Trump’s
rhetoric, we would be foolish not to expect repression in return.
So we
must be prepared for that, too, politically, by strengthening groups
like Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, Black Lives Matter, and the
immigrant-rights movement; emotionally, by practicing solidarity; and
practically, by picking our battles and not wasting precious time and
energy on infighting and sectarian hair-splitting. If we’re going to
survive the Trump regime, and have any hope of blocking it in 2018 and
overturning it in 2020, we’re going to have to work together: Clinton
and Stein voters, gay and straight, black and brown and white, Christian
and Jew and Muslim and atheist, socialist and liberal (and even some
libertarians).
The next four years will test
our country—and our movement—like nothing else we have seen in our
lifetimes. Welcome to the fight.
How to do it?
More from The Nation:
Citizen movements—the Fight for $15, Black Lives Matter, the Dreamers, 350.org,
and others—drove reform in the Obama years. Now these same movements
will have to mobilize to fend off reaction. Progressives in the House
and Senate need to take over the Democratic Party’s agenda and message.
New populist energy can drive important reforms at the state and local
level, and recruit and train a new generation of populist candidates.
Democrats don’t need to abandon their social liberalism; they need to
develop their economic populism. If they do, the Trump era may turn out
to be as short as his attention span.
No comments:
Post a Comment