Donald
Trump is running on the erroneous belief that ending regulations,
particularly environmental ones, is the key to faster economic growth.
Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (D-NY), who was assassinated June 6, 1968, explained just how misguided that view was just weeks before he was killed.
U.S.
economic growth has emerged as a major issue in the presidential
campaign. Donald Trump has many untenable ideas, as the Washington Post
explained in an
April piece headlined, “There is math, there is fantasy math, and then there’s Donald Trump’s economic math.”
That
article quoted an economist at the Tax Foundation (who helped model
Trump’s tax plan) saying, “It’s not consistent with historical
experience. It’s more consistent with a world where we’re hiring butlers
for our vacation homes on Ganymede” [Jupiter’s largest moon].”
I wanted to zero in on one of Donald Trump’s fictional strategies for boosting economic growth: As he
explained last month to CNBC, “we’re going to be getting rid of a tremendous amount of regulations.”
In particular, when Fox News’ Chris Wallace
pressed Trump
in March on how he’d cut the federal budget, Trump answered “Department
of Environmental Protection [sic]. We are going to get rid of it in
almost every form.”
In reality, slashing regulations, particularly regulations from the Environmental Protection
Agency, would be very counterproductive, as a 2015 Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
report to Congress
made clear. The OMB found that ten years’ worth of major Federal
regulations provided annual benefits to the nation (in 2001 dollars) of
between $216 billion and $812 billion, while the estimated annual costs
were only between $57 billion and $85 billion.
Of
that, EPA regulations delivered the majority of benefits ($132.5 to
$652 billion) but only about half the costs ($31 to $37.5 billion).
Of
course, lots of those benefits were things like reduced health care
costs because the air got cleaner — and those benefits don’t show up in
our primary measure of economic growth, GDP. Indeed, reducing sickness
and death actually lowers GDP.
Who can doubt that our wildly unsustainable global economic system is now the
biggest of Ponzi schemes — where the economy appears to grow faster the more we burn fossil fuels and destroy a livable climate?
Robert F. Kennedy explained why GDP is a useless measure of economic well-being back in the 1960s.
Robert
Kennedy was one of the few national politicians ever to challenge our
monomaniacal pursuit of GDP to the exclusion of true economic
well-being. In
Detroit on May 5, 1967
he pointed out: “Let us be clear at the outset that we will find neither
national purpose nor personal satisfaction in a mere continuation of
economic progress, in an endless amassing of worldly goods.”
Weeks before he was killed, he spoke on this subject at the
University of Kansas, March 18, 1968 — in what President Obama
called “one of the most beautiful of his speeches.”
No comments:
Post a Comment