Chris Hayes gave you your whole argument last night. As usual, MSNBC embed sux, so click the link.
At the end he talks about actual, pragmatic, useful options that would help millions of people and earn us gratitude and friends in the region - pretty much the opposite of what missiles will do.
Scott Lemieux discusses the weakness of the pro-attack case and concludes:
The case for attacking Syria fails on multiple levels. The best-case scenario is pretty much that a limited amount of destruction is inflicted on Syria pointlessly. Congress should say no.
No comments:
Post a Comment